Solaris

What happens when you mix Tarkovsky with 70s sci-fi? Apparently, exactly what it sounds like. To me, it felt like oil and water.

Tarkovsky is often a difficult filmmaker, with movies that can either alienate or cut to the quick. But, having been so deeply moved by The Sacrifice, Nostalgia, and Stalker, I was braced for something more than what I got.

I wanted so badly for this to contain the same piercing, mystic insightfulness as Tarkovsky's other works. But every time I thought "Yes! There's what I've been waiting for!" it would dwindle back to ramshackle space station interiors, painfully dated costume design, and (surprisingly) predictable story beats. 

I feel this disappointment most strikingly in the imagery. Tarkovsky's ever-present intuition for poetic images is seen in the undulating underwater reeds of the opening--only to be replaced by generic, artificially colored, and ultimately lifeless images of the Solaris Ocean later on.

Is it truly a bad film? No. But its grasps toward trademark Tarkovsky transcendence only serve to outline my dissatisfaction with how far it falls short of what it could be.

Previous
Previous

The Reverse Gaze of Nope

Next
Next

Honeyland